首页> 外文OA文献 >Sound transmission loss: comparison conventional techniques with sound intensity techniques
【2h】

Sound transmission loss: comparison conventional techniques with sound intensity techniques

机译:声音传输损失:将传统技术与声音强度技术进行比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Sound transmission losses for a single layer wall are measured in a reverberation room facility using conventional methods (ASTM E90) and the more recently introduced sound intensity method. The specimen is placed in five positions in the tunnel between the two reverberation rooms and measurements are made for four different absorptive conditions in the smaller room. Significant differences between the two measurement techniques are found at low frequencies and at high frequencies. Low-frequency differences are attributed partly to the increase in sound energy close to the surfaces of the receiving room (the Waterhouse effect) and the lack of any consideration of this in standard test methods. Inclusion of the Waterhouse term in the conventional transmission loss formula improves the agreement between the conventional and the sound intensity measurement technique at low frequencies. High-frequency differences are not explained.
机译:使用常规方法(ASTM E90)和最近引入的声强方法,在混响室设备中测量单层墙的传声损耗。将样品放置在两个混响室之间的隧道中的五个位置,并在较小的房间中针对四种不同的吸收条件进行测量。在低频和高频下,两种测量技术之间存在显着差异。低频差异部分归因于靠近接收室表面的声能增加(水室效应),并且在标准测试方法中对此没有任何考虑。在常规的传输损耗公式中包含Waterhouse项可以改善常规技术和低频声强测量技术之间的一致性。没有解释高频差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号